Friday, September 27, 2013

Should the U.S. Finance Alternative-Energy Startups?

The federal government has long been a player in the energy industry. On top of its regulatory role, the U.S. government extends tax credits to companies in fossil fuels, renewables and nuclear energy alike.

It also makes direct investments. The Tennessee Valley Authority, for instance, a supplier of power to seven states, was created by Congress and has been owned by the U.S. since 1933.

In more recent years, partly in response to some very public failures, controversy has erupted over the Department of Energy's investments in clean-energy startups. The department has a $34 billion portfolio of loan guarantees to solar, wind, nuclear and other companies. The energy secretary reported in May that about 2% of the portfolio represents losses. Some of the biggest losses were linked to Solyndra, a maker of solar panels, and Fisker Automotive, an electric-car company.

Supporters of the policy say the government's investment role is essential for clean-energy startups to keep their costs down and be able to bring innovative products to market. But critics say that politics play an outsize role in the government's investment decisions, and that when government invests the taxpayers' money in new and unproven technologies, it skews the marketplace.

Read more at Wall Street Journal

No comments:

Post a Comment